Skip to content

Each page below reads one audited claim through the framework’s five lenses — philosophy of science, neuroscience, pharmacology, measurement theory and mechanistic interpretability — as an illustration of how the same criteria divide by discipline and what each field’s tradition asks of the evidence.

Criterion statuses match the paper’s audit records. The lens grouping, the key distinctions and the matrices around them are exploratory, and no verdict rests on them. The audits themselves are under Case Studies.

ClaimExploratory lens analysisAudit
Induction Headslens readingaudit
Copy Suppressionlens readingaudit
Greater-Thanlens readingaudit
Modular Additionlens readingaudit
Refusal Directionlens readingaudit
Successor Headslens readingaudit
Superpositionlens readingaudit
Global Workspacelens readingaudit
Docstring Circuitlens readingaudit
Gender Bias Circuitslens readingaudit
IOI Circuitlens readingaudit
Othello World Modellens readingaudit
SAE Featureslens readingaudit
Probing Classifierslens readingaudit
Induction Heads (General ICL)lens readingaudit
Knowledge Neuronslens readingaudit